Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Depth to the airway lumen at the level of the cricothyroid membrane measured by ultrasound

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: a protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC-trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Elastography in Breast Imaging

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. History and Latest Advances in Flow Estimation Technology: From 1-D in 2-D to 3-D in 4-D

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Pressure Difference Estimation in Carotid Bulbs using Vector Flow Imaging - A Phantom Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is increasingly becoming an integrated tool for circulatory evaluation in the intensive care unit and the operating room. Therefore, it is imperative to know the reproducibility of measurements obtained by echocardiography. In this study, a comparison of cardiac output (CO) measurements obtained with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution (TD) was carried out to test the precision, accuracy and trending ability of CO measurements obtained with TEE.

METHODS: Twenty-five patients completed the study. Each patient was placed in the following successive positions: supine, head-down tilt, head-up tilt, supine, supine with phenylephrine administration, pace heart rate 80 beats per minute (bpm), pace heart rate 110 bpm. TEE CO and PAC CO were measured simultaneously. The agreement was analysed by Bland-Altman plots, and to assess trending ability, a polar plot was constructed.

RESULTS: Both methods showed an acceptable precision 8% (PAC TD) and 16% (TEE). In comparison with PAC TD, the TEE was associated with a bias of -0.22 l/minute [95% confidence interval: -0.54; 0.10], wide limits of agreement (-1.73 l/minute; 1.29 l/minute), a percentage error of 38.6% and a trending ability with a radial degree of 53.6°, corresponding to a poor trending ability.

CONCLUSION: In comparison, CO measurements obtained with TEE and PAC TD had wide limits of agreement, a larger percentage error than would be expected from the precision of the two methods, and a poor trending ability. Thus, TEE is not interchangeable with PAC TD for measuring CO.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind58
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)80-8
Antal sider9
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2014

ID: 44893072