Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Long-term risks after kidney donation: How do we inform potential donors? A survey from descartes and EKITA transplantation working groups

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Incidence and impact of parvovirus B19 infection in seronegative solid organ transplant recipients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Increased incidence and improved prognosis of glomerulonephritis: a national 30-year study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Geir Mjøen
  • Umberto Maggiore
  • Nicos Kessaris
  • Diederik Kimenai
  • Bruno Watschinger
  • Cristophe Mariat
  • Mehmet Sukru Sever
  • Marta Crespo
  • Licia Peruzzi
  • Goce Spasovski
  • Søren Schwartz Sørensen
  • Uwe Heemann
  • Julio Pascual
  • Ondrej Viklicky
  • Aisling E Courtney
  • Karine Hadaya
  • Laszlo Wagner
  • Ionut Nistor
  • Vassilis Hadjianastassiou
  • Magdalena Durlik
  • Ilkka Helanterä
  • Rainer Oberbauer
  • Gabriel Oniscu
  • Luuk Hilbrands
  • Daniel Abramowicz
  • European Renal Association-European Dialysis Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States (DESCARTES) working group and the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) European Kidney Transplant Association (EKITA) – Collaborators are in the Appendix
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Publications from the last decade have increased knowledge regarding long-term risks after kidney donation. We wanted to perform a survey to assess how transplant professionals in Europe inform potential kidney donors regarding long-term risks. The objectives of the survey were to determine how they inform donors and to what extent, and to evaluate the degree of variation.

METHODS: All transplant professionals involved in the evaluation process were considered eligible, regardless of the type of profession. The survey was dispatched as a link to a web-based survey. The subjects included questions on demographics, the information policy of the respondent and the use of risk calculators, including the difference of relative and absolute risks and how the respondents themselves understood these risks.

RESULTS: The main finding was a large variation in how often different long-term risks were discussed with the potential donors, i.e. from always to never. Eighty percent of respondents stated that they always discuss the risk of end-stage renal disease, while 56% of respondents stated that they always discuss the risk of preeclampsia. Twenty percent of respondents answered correctly regarding the relationship between absolute and relative risks for rare outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: The use of written information and checklists should be encouraged. This may improve standardization regarding the information provided to potential living kidney donors in Europe. There is a need for information and education among European transplant professionals regarding long-term risks after kidney donation and how to interpret and present these risks.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
Vol/bind36
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1742-1753
Antal sider12
ISSN0931-0509
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 27 aug. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

ID: 62444324