Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: a protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC-trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Inflammatory response, fluid balance and outcome in emergency high-risk abdominal surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Training non-intensivist doctors to work with COVID-19 patients in intensive care units

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Discriminatory plasma biomarkers predict specific clinical phenotypes of necrotizing soft-tissue infections

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Considerations on the strengths and limitations of using disease-related mortality as an outcome in clinical research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: In patients with septic shock, mortality is high, and survivors experience long-term physical, mental and social impairments. The ongoing Conservative vs Liberal Approach to fluid therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial assesses the benefits and harms of a restrictive vs standard-care intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. The hypothesis is that IV fluid restriction improves patient-important long-term outcomes.

AIM: To assess the predefined patient-important long-term outcomes in patients randomised into the CLASSIC trial.

METHODS: In this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will assess all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cognitive function 1 year after randomisation in the two intervention groups. The 1-year mortality will be collected from electronic patient records or central national registries in most participating countries. We will contact survivors and assess EuroQol 5-Dimension, -5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol score. We will analyse mortality by logistic regression and use general linear models to assess HRQoL and cognitive function.

DISCUSSION: With this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will provide patient-important data on long-term survival, HRQoL and cognitive function of restrictive vs standard-care IV fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind64
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)410–416
Antal sider7
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2020

Bibliografisk note

© 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 58627727