Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Lifestyle interventions after ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Predictors of patient-reported outcomes at discharge in patients with heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Questionnaire measuring patient participation in health care: Scale development and psychometric evaluation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Facilitating transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era of COVID-19: Recommendations for programmes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Dancing with atrial fibrillation - How arrhythmia affects everyday life of family members: A qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Risk factors of atrial fibrillation include diabetes, obesity and physical inactivity. Positive effects such as decreased atrial fibrillation burden have been reported for atrial fibrillation patients who have participated in lifestyle changing interventions after atrial fibrillation ablation treatment.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the evidence on the benefits and harms of lifestyle and risk factor management interventions in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

METHOD: Our systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Psychinfo, Web of Science and CENTRAL using key terms related to atrial fibrillation and lifestyle, including interventional trials. The primary outcomes were mortality and serious adverse events. Random effects meta-analyses of outcomes were conducted when appropriate.

RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials and two non-randomised interventional trials with a total of 498 patients were included. Six primary events were reported for the intervention groups and five events for the control groups (relative risk of 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 3.1, I2 0%, P = 0.537). Effects in favour of the intervention groups were found for atrial fibrillation frequency (0.82 points, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.03, I2 87.3%, P = 0.005), atrial fibrillation duration (-0.76 points, 95% CI -1.64 to 0.12, I2 89.1%, P = 0.002) and body mass index (-5.40 kg/m2, 95% CI 6.22 to -2.57, I2 83.9%, P = 0.013). Risk of bias in the four studies was judged to be low to moderate.

CONCLUSION: Lifestyle changing interventions seem to have a positive effect on outcomes relevant to patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, but the included studies were small, interventions were inhomogeneous, and the quality of evidence was low to moderate. More studies are warranted.

TidsskriftEuropean journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)564-579
Antal sider16
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2020

ID: 62443371