Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Is clinical heterogeneity the foremost prominent threat to the validity of meta-analyses?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Effect of immunoglobulin G on cytokine response in necrotising soft-tissue infection: a post-hoc analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Ischaemic vascular disease and long-term mortality in emergency abdominal surgical patients: A population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Phrenic Nerve Block on Severe Post-Hepatectomy Shoulder Pain: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Pilot Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The effects of adding quinolones to beta-lactam antibiotics for sepsis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  5. Does rocking motion calm delirious patients in ICU? A multicentre randomised clinical trial protocol (RockingICU)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A new tool to assess Clinical Diversity In Meta-analyses (CDIM) of interventions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache: a randomised, blinded, clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Pharmacokinetics of an intravenous bolus dose of clonidine in children undergoing surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Noninvasive respiratory support in the hypoxaemic peri-operative/periprocedural patient: a joint ESA/ESICM guideline

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Systematic review methodology with meta-analyses have long been regarded as one of the highest forms of research methodology and a cornerstone in many clinical guidelines. A common criticism of this methodology is the handling of the clinical and/or statistical heterogeneity which arises when pooling heterogenous data from different trials, settings and interventions.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind65
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)863-864
Antal sider2
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2021

ID: 65654447