Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Human Muscle Protein Synthesis Rates after Intake of Hydrolyzed Porcine-Derived and Cows' Milk Whey Proteins-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Impaired lipolysis in propionic acidemia: A new metabolic myopathy?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effects of protein intake prior to carbohydrate-restricted endurance exercise: a randomized crossover trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. High-fat overfeeding impairs peripheral glucose metabolism and muscle microvascular eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Effect of the incretin hormones on the endocrine pancreas in end-stage renal disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Line Q Bendtsen
  • Tanja K Thorning
  • Søren Reitelseder
  • Christian Ritz
  • Erik T Hansen
  • Gerrit van Hall
  • Arne Astrup
  • Anders Sjödin
  • Lars Holm
Vis graf over relationer

Abstract: Background: Whey protein has been shown to be one of the best proteins to stimulate muscle protein synthesis rate (MPS), but other high quality proteins, e.g., animal/porcine-derived, could have similar effects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of hydrolyzed porcine proteins from blood (HPB) and muscle (HPM), in comparison to hydrolyzed whey protein (HW), on MPS after intake of 15 g alone or 30 g protein as part of a mixed meal. We hypothesized that the postprandial MPS would be similar for porcine proteins and whey protein.

DESIGN: Eighteen men (mean ± SD age: 24 ± 1 year; BMI: 21.7 ± 0.4 kg/m2) participated in the randomized, double-blind, three-way cross-over study. Subjects consumed the three test products (HPB, HPM and HW) in a random order in two servings at each test day. Serving 1 consisted of a drink with 15 g protein and serving 2 of a drink with 30 g protein together with a mixed meal. A flood-primed continuous infusion of (ring-13C6) phenylalanine was performed and muscle biopsies, blood and urine samples were collected for determination of MPS, muscle free leucine, plasma amino acid concentrations and urea excretion.

RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the MPS measured after consuming 15 g protein alone or 30 g with a mixed meal (p = 0.53) of HPB (0.048 ± 0.007 vs. 0.049 ± 0.008%/h, resp.), HPM (0.063 ± 0.011 vs. 0.062 ± 0.011 %/h, resp.) and HW (0.058 ± 0.007 vs. 0.071 ± 0.013%/h, resp.). However, the impact of protein type on MPS reached statistical tendency (HPB vs. HPM (p = 0.093) and HPB vs. HW (p = 0.067)) with no difference between HPM and HW (p = 0.88). Plasma leucine, branched-chain, essential and total amino acids were generally higher for HPB and HW than HPM (p < 0.01), which reflected their content in the proteins. Muscle-free leucine was higher for HPB than HW and HPM (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Hydrolyzed porcine proteins from blood and muscle resulted in an MPS similar to that of HW, although with a trend for porcine blood proteins to be inferior to muscle proteins and whey. Consequently, these porcine-derived muscle proteins can be used similarly to whey protein to support maintenance of skeletal muscle as part of supplements and ingredients in foods.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer989
TidsskriftNutrients
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer5
ISSN2072-6643
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 30 apr. 2019

ID: 58286386