Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: Cochrane Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Burden and Causes of Hospital Admissions in Heart Failure During the Last Year of Life

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Reply: Physical Activity and Fitness in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Ready for Prime Time?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  3. Central and Peripheral Determinants of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Income Inequality and Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Global Between-Country Analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Long-Term Risk of Heart Failure in Breast Cancer Patients After Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Rod S Taylor
  • Linda Long
  • Ify R Mordi
  • Michael Tvilling Madsen
  • Edward J Davies
  • Hasnain Dalal
  • Karen Rees
  • Sally J Singh
  • Christian Gluud
  • Ann-Dorthe Zwisler
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: This study performed a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing call for trials of models of ExCR for patients with HF that provide alternatives to conventional center-based provision and recruitment of patients that reflect a broader HF population.

METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched between January 2013 and January 2018. Randomized trials comparing patients undergoing ExCR to control patients not undergoing exercise were included. Study outcomes were pooled using meta-analysis. Metaregression examined potential effect modification according to ExCR program characteristics, and risk of bias, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were applied.

RESULTS: Across 44 trials (n = 5,783; median follow-up of 6 months), compared with control subjects, ExCR did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 1.21; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.26 to 3.10) but did reduce all-cause hospitalization (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.83; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.54 to 0.92) and HF-specific hospitalization (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.14 for 2.46), and patients reported improved Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire overall scores (mean difference: -7.1; 95% CI: -10.5 to -3.7; TSA-adjusted CI: -13.2 to -1.0). No evidence of differential effects across different models of delivery, including center- versus home-based programs, were found.

CONCLUSIONS: This review supports the beneficial effects of ExCR on patient outcomes. These benefits appear to be consistent across ExCR program characteristics. GRADE and TSA assessments indicated that further high-quality randomized trials are needed.

TidsskriftJACC. Heart failure
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)691-705
Antal sider15
StatusUdgivet - 1 aug. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 57627367