Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Effect of Instructor Feedback on Skills Retention After Laparoscopic Simulator Training: Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Direct Observation vs. Video-Based Assessment in Flexible Cystoscopy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Nonspecialist Raters Can Provide Reliable Assessments of Procedural Skills

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery-Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Ensuring Competency of Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons-Exploring Standard Setting Methods and their Consequences

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Internet-based therapy with FearFighter for anxiety disorders: a randomised clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Women and partners' experiences of critical perinatal events: a qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Instructor feedback reduces the number of repetitions and time to reach proficiency during laparoscopic simulator training. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of instructor feedback on long-term skill retention.

METHODS: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized trial. Participants were surgical novices (medical students). All participants (n = 99) initially practiced a laparoscopic salpingectomy on the LapSim virtual reality simulator to proficiency. The intervention group could request instructor feedback, whereas the control group could not. After 6 months, the participants (n = 65) practiced on the simulator until they reached proficiency again. The primary outcomes were the total time and the number of repetitions.

RESULTS: Initially, the intervention group used significantly fewer repetitions (29 vs 65, p < 0.0005) and less total training time (162 vs 342min, p < 0.0005) than the control group to reach the proficiency level. At follow-up, both the groups used an equal number of repetitions (21 vs 20, p = 0.72) and time (83 vs 73min, p = 0.37) to reach the same proficiency level.

CONCLUSIONS: Instructor feedback during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training does not affect the long-term retention of skills.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Surgical Education
Vol/bind72
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)53-60
ISSN1931-7204
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

ID: 44525619