Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Do stage of disease, comorbidity or access to treatment explain socioeconomic differences in survival after ovarian cancer? - A cohort study among Danish women diagnosed 2005-2010

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Parental occupational organic dust exposure and selected childhood cancers in Denmark 1968-2016

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Trends in thyroid cancer: Retrospective analysis of incidence and survival in Denmark 1980-2014

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in Denmark 1996-2012: A national prospective study of 219 patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Use of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of head and neck cancer: A nationwide case-control study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence, type distribution, and risk factors for oral HPV in Danish renal transplant recipients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Human papillomavirus vaccination in immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Glioma risk associated with extent of estimated European genetic ancestry in African Americans and Hispanics

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: In order to reduce social inequality in cancer survival, knowledge is needed about where in the cancer trajectory disparities occur, and how social and health-related aspects may interact. We aimed to determine whether socioeconomic factors are related to cancer diagnosis stage, and whether socioeconomic disparities in survival after ovarian cancer can be explained by socioeconomic differences in cancer stage, comorbidity, treatment or lifestyle factors.

METHODS: In the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database we identified 2873 cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2010. From this data we retrieved information on prognostic factors, treatment information and lifestyle factors. Age, vital status, comorbidity, education, income and cohabitation status were ascertained from nationwide administrative registers. Associations were analyzed with logistic regression and Cox regression models.

RESULTS: Educational level was weakly associated with cancer stage. Short education, lower income and living without a partner were related to poorer survival after ovarian cancer. Among women with early cancer stage, HR (95% CI) for death was 1.75 (1.20-2.54) in shorter compared to longer educated women. After adjustment for comorbid conditions, cancer stage, tumour histology, operation status and lifestyle factors, socioeconomic differences in survival persisted.

CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disparities in survival after ovarian cancer were to some extent, but not fully explained by differences in important prognostic factors, suggesting further investigations into this problem, however implying that socially less advantaged ovarian cancer patients should receive attention during cancer treatment and rehabilitation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCancer epidemiology
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)353-9
ISSN1877-7821
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2015

ID: 45314886