Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: dissection plane with viscoelastic and air can be different

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Fungal infection after endothelial keratoplasty: Association with hypothermic corneal storage

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Macular spatial distribution of preserved autofluorescence in patients with choroideremia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. International multicentre retrospective cohort study of ocular adnexal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Early postnatal hyperglycaemia is a risk factor for treatment-demanding retinopathy of prematurity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Andrew R Ross
  • Dalia G Said
  • Abdalla El-Amin
  • Saif Altaan
  • Javier Cabrerizo
  • Mario Nubile
  • Emily Hogan
  • Leonardo Mastropasqua
  • Harminder Singh Dua
Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: To investigate and define the nature of big bubbles (BB) formed by injection of viscoelastic in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

METHODS: Intrastromal injections of 0.1 and 0.3 mL of sodium hyaluronate 1.2% and 0.6% were made into sclera-corneal discs (n = 32) at superficial (anterior-third), midstromal (middle-third) and deep (posterior-third) levels to simulate deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Postinjection optical coherence tomograms (OCT) were obtained with the needle in situ. The samples were sectioned and examined histologically. Twelve control samples were injected with air.

RESULTS: With superficial injections (n=8) only intrastromal accumulation of viscoelastic was noted. With midstromal injections (n=10) intrastromal accumulation of viscoelastic (n=6) and intrastromal big bubbles (IBB) (n=4) with substantial and variable stromal tissue in the walls were noted. No type 1, type 2 or mixed BB were noted. With deep injections (n=14), type 1 BB (n=4), IBB (n=4) and mixed BB (n=6) were obtained.There was no difference in the results with the two different concentrations of viscoelastic used. With air injection (n=12), 10 type 1 and 1 type 2 BB and 1 mixed BB were obtained. No IBB was noted.

CONCLUSIONS: BB obtained by injection of viscoelastic and air can be different. The former tends to occur at the site of injection, especially with midstromal injections, takes the form of tissue separation by stretch and tearing and does not cleave in a consistent plane like air. Surgeons should be aware of IBB created by viscodissection and not confuse it for a type1 BB. Intraoperative OCT should help identify IBB.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe British journal of ophthalmology
Vol/bind102
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1646-1652
Antal sider7
ISSN0007-1161
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 56612118