Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparison of patients undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation and spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Phenotypic variability in Muenke syndrome-observations from five Danish families

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Microvascular dysfunction is associated with plasma osteoprotegerin levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Serum levels of YKL-40 increases in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Hyperpolarization through ATP-sensitive potassium channels; relevance to migraine pathology

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and Cluster Headache

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. CGRP in rat mesenteric artery and vein - receptor expression, CGRP presence and potential roles

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Fluorescent Analogues of Human α-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide with Potent Vasodilator Activity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Susanne Bondesson
  • Thomas Pettersson
  • André Erdling
  • Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
  • Angelica Wackenfors
  • Lars Edvinsson
Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: As more patients survive coronary events, the prevalence of patients with refractory angina pectoris is increasing. The aim was to evaluate the effects of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and compare with optimal medically treated patients with refractory angina.

METHODS: 153 patients with refractory angina were treated with either EECP, SCS, or were retained on their pharmacological treatment (control). Glyceryl trinitrate usage and Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification were registered at baseline, 6 and 12 months after therapy.

RESULTS: Both EECP and SCS reduced the angina as compared with controls (P<0.001). Patients treated with EECP showed a more effective reduction as compared with SCS patients (P<0.05). Both treatments resulted in significantly decreased glyceryl trinitrate usage at 6 and 12 months follow-up (P<0.001). The nitrate consumed was unaltered in the controls.

DISCUSSION: The results from this study show that both EECP and SCS therapy reduce angina in patients with refractory angina pectoris; the response to EECP was slightly more effective than that to SCS. Thus, EECP can be used as an alternative treatment for patients not responding to electrical stimulation. The beneficial effects in the treated groups were maintained during the 12 months follow-up period.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCoronary Artery Disease
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)627-34
Antal sider8
ISSN0954-6928
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2008
Eksternt udgivetJa

ID: 44875002