Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FLT small animal PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF treatment response in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the localization of head and neck paraganglioma compared with 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. 18F-labeled norepinephrine transporter tracer [18F]NS12137: radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Synthesis and evaluation of (18)F-labeled 5-HT2A receptor agonists as PET ligands

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Automated synthesis and PET evaluation of both enantiomers of [¹⁸F]FMISO

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. The impact of weakly bound ⁸⁹Zr on preclinical studies: non-specific accumulation in solid tumors and aspergillus infection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) are widely used for positron emission tomography (PET) brain tumor imaging; however, comparative studies are scarce. The aim of this study therefore was to compare FLT and FET PET for the assessment of anti-VEGF response in glioblastoma xenografts.

METHODS: Xenografts with confirmed intracranial glioblastoma were treated with anti-VEGF therapy (B20-4.1) or saline as control. Weekly bioluminescence imaging (BLI), FLT and FET PET/CT were used to follow treatment response. Tracer uptake of FLT and FET was quantified using maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs). Survival, the Ki67 proliferation index and micro-vessel density (MVD) were evaluated.

RESULTS: In contrast to FLT TBRs, FET TBRs were significantly lower as early as one week after treatment initiation in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. Following two weeks of treatment, both FLT and FET TBRs were significantly lower in the anti-VEGF group. In contrast, no significant difference between the treatment groups was detected using BLI. Furthermore, we found a significantly lower MVD in the anti-VEGF group as compared to the control group. However, we found no difference in the Ki67 proliferation index or mean survival time.

CONCLUSION: FET appears to be a more sensitive tracer than FLT to measure early response to anti-VEGF therapy with PET. Advances in knowledge and implications for patient care FET PET appears to be an early predictor of anti-VEGF efficacy. Confirmation of these results in clinical studies is needed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNuclear Medicine and Biology
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)198-205
Antal sider8
ISSN0969-8051
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2016

ID: 49459579