Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparing the effect of non-medical mechanical restraint preventive factors between psychiatric units in Denmark and Norway

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Internet-based therapy with FearFighter for anxiety disorders: a randomised clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Automatically generated smartphone data and subjective stress in healthy individuals - a pilot study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prospective psychometric characterization of hip and knee arthroplasty patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Increase in depression diagnoses and prescribed antidepressants among young girls. A national cohort study 2000-2013

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Pilot test of an online training module on near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring for the randomised clinical trial SafeBoosC-III

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Smoking cessation prolongs survival in female cancer survivors - the Danish nurse cohort

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Joint tobacco smoking and alcohol intake exacerbates cancer risk in women- the Danish nurse cohort

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Jesper Bak
  • Vibeke Zoffmann
  • Dorte Maria Sestoft
  • Roger Almvik
  • Volkert Dirk Siersma
  • Mette Brandt-Christensen
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical restraint (MR) is controversial, and large differences regarding the use of MR are often found among countries. In an earlier study, we observed that MR was used twice as frequently in Denmark than Norway.

AIMS: To examine how presumed MR preventive factors of non-medical origin may explain the differing number of MR episodes between Denmark and Norway.

METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional survey of psychiatric units. Linear regression was used to assess the confounding effects of the MR preventive factors, i.e. whether a difference in the impact of these factors is evident between Denmark and Norway.

RESULTS: Six MR preventive factors confounded [∆exp(B)> 10%] the difference in MR use between Denmark and Norway, including staff education (- 51%), substitute staff (- 17%), acceptable work environment (- 15%), separation of acutely disturbed patients (13%), patient-staff ratio (- 11%), and the identification of the patient's crisis triggers (- 10%).

CONCLUSIONS: These six MR preventive factors might partially explain the difference in the frequency of MR episodes observed in the two countries, i.e. higher numbers in Denmark than Norway. One MR preventive factor was not supported by earlier research, the identification of the patient's crisis triggers; therefore, more research on the mechanisms involved is needed.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: None of the six MR preventive factors presents any adverse effects; therefore, units in Denmark and Norway may consider investigating the effect of implementing, the identification of the patient's crisis triggers, an increased number of staff per patient, increased staff education, a better work environment and reduced use of substitute staff in practice.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Vol/bind69
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)433-43
Antal sider11
ISSN0803-9488
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2015

ID: 45443171