Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence of heart failure and other risk factors among first-degree relatives of women with peripartum cardiomyopathy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Syncope and orthostatic hypotension: early markers of cardiac disease in the general population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Heritability of resting heart rate and association with mortality in middle-aged and elderly twins

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence and risk factors of prolonged QT interval and electrocardiographic abnormalities in persons living with HIV

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Association between Type D personality and outcomes in patients with non-ischemic heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with positive blood cultures: a Danish nationwide study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: Electrocardiographic bundle branch block (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary care population free of major CV disease.

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of primary care patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording between 2001 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) as well as absolute risks of CV outcomes based on various BBB subtypes.

RESULTS: We included 202 268 individuals with a median follow-up period of 7.8 years (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 4.9-10.6). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was associated with heart failure (HF) in both men (HR 3.96, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.76) and women (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.94) and with CV death in men (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.35). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was associated with pacemaker implantation in both men (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.89) and women (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.67), HF in both sexes and weakly associated with CV death in men. Regarding LBBB, we found an increasing hazard of HF with increasing QRS-interval duration (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42 per 10 ms increase in men and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 per 10 ms increase in women). Absolute 10-year risk predictions across age-specific and sex-specific subgroups revealed clinically relevant differences between having various BBB subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic findings of BBB subtypes in primary care patients without major CV disease should be considered warnings of future HF and pacemaker implantation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHeart (British Cardiac Society)
Vol/bind105
Udgave nummer15
Sider (fra-til)1160-1167
Antal sider8
ISSN1355-6037
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2019

Bibliografisk note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 57661204