Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Cervical Spine Clearance in Trauma Patients with an Unreliable Physical Examination

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Delphi Study to Reach International Consensus Among Vascular Surgeons on Major Arterial Vascular Surgical Complications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) as an Added Predictor to Existing Preoperative Risk Assessments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Spontaneous Retroperitoneal and Rectus Sheath Hemorrhage-Management, Risk Factors and Outcomes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Red blood cell transfusion in surgery: an observational study of the trends in the USA from 2011 to 2016

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Abnormal routine blood tests as predictors of mortality in acutely admitted patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Neuroinflammatory markers associate with cognitive decline after major surgery: findings of an explorative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe and compare the timing of cervical spine clearance in trauma patients with an unreliable physical examination.

METHODS: We prospectively included adult trauma patients admitted with a cervical collar and an unreliable clinical examination (as defined by the NEXUS criteria) at two level 1 trauma centers: one in the USA (US) and one in Denmark (DK). We excluded patients with cervical spine injuries requiring a collar or surgery as treatment and patients with a collar placed after hospital arrival. The primary outcome was time from emergency department (ED) arrival to collar removal. Secondary outcomes included time to CT of the cervical spine (CTCS). At the US trauma center, an institutional protocol allowing cervical spine clearance exclusively by CTCS was in place. At the Danish trauma center, cervical spine clearance was based on a clinical evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon, usually after CTCS.

RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included (US: n = 56; DK: n = 57). The median age was 47 years, and 68% were males. The main reasons for an unreliable physical examination were a Glasgow Coma Scale score below 14 (35%), distracting injuries (26%), cervical spine tenderness (13%) and intoxication (13%). The injury severity score at the US trauma center was higher than at the DK trauma center (median: 17 vs. 11, p = 0.03). Both time to CTCS (median: 41 vs. 18 min, p < 0.0001) and time to collar removal (median: 1042 vs. 49 min, p < 0.0001) were significantly greater at the US trauma center.

CONCLUSIONS: Time to collar removal was significantly greater in a trauma center utilizing a cervical spine clearance protocol based on CTCS. As patients may develop complications related to the collar, future studies should clarify how early removal can be implemented without increasing the risk of morbidity.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftWorld Journal of Surgery
Vol/bind44
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1113-1120
Antal sider8
ISSN0364-2313
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2020

ID: 58541562