Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Auditory brainstem response - a valid and cost-effective screening tool for vestibular schwannoma?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Dynamic soft tissue changes in the orbit after a blowout fracture

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Correlation between HPV status at T and N sites of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Indications, risk of lower airway infection, and complications to pediatric tracheotomy: report from a tertiary referral center

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The Natural History of Hearing Loss in Pendred Syndrome and Non-Syndromic Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Language outcome in children with congenital hearing impairment: The influence of etiology

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Facial nerve schwannomas presenting with vestibular dysfunction: a case series

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The Effect of a Distributed Virtual Reality Simulation Training Program on Dissection Mastoidectomy Performance

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. A mechanoelectrical mechanism for detection of sound envelopes in the hearing organ

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

CONCLUSION: Contemporary auditory brainstem response (ABR) is not valid as a screening tool for VS, when considering the sensitivity of 80%, the specificity of 77%, and the positive predictive value of 3.4%, MRI screening is superior to ABR in Denmark when considering cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness of ABR vs MRI, when screening for VS in a clinical setting.

METHOD: Data was collected on all patients subjected to an ABR during a 3-year period (2005-2008) at a tertiary referral center. The data were compared to results of MRI and with data from The Danish National VS Database. In total, 1447 adults underwent ABR, of whom 349 were referred for a subsequent MRI. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. To assess the cost-effectiveness of ABR vs MRI, procedure costs for ABR and MRI were retrieved from the National Board of Health.

RESULTS: Twelve (3.4%) of 349 patients were diagnosed with a VS. Of the 1098 patients not referred for MRI, three (0.3%) were later diagnosed with a VS. The sensitivity and specificity of ABR in diagnosing a VS were 80% and 77%, respectively. Procedure costs were 326 EURO for the ABR and 319 EURO for the MRI.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Oto-Laryngologica
Vol/bind136
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)660-2
Antal sider3
ISSN0001-6489
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2016

ID: 49660133