Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Anesthesiologists’ airway management expertise: Identifying subjective and objective knowledge gaps

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Long-term IV access in paediatrics - why, what, where, who and how

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Continuous peripheral perfusion index in patients admitted to hospital wards - An observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Association between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neuronal injury or amyloidosis and cognitive decline after major surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Ultrasound identification of the cricothyroid membrane: the new standard in preparing for front-of-neck airway access

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Anaphylaxis in children and adults

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Failure in airway management continues to cause preventable patient harm, and the recommended continuing education is challenged by anaesthesiologists´ unknown knowledge gaps. This study aimed to identify anaesthesiologists´ subjective and objective knowledge gaps as well as areas where anaesthesiologists are incorrect and unaware.

METHODS: An adaptive E-learning programme with 103 questions on adult airway management was used for subjective and objective assessment of anaesthesiologists´ knowledge. All anaesthesiologists in the Capital Region of Denmark were invited to participate.

RESULTS: The response rate was 67% (191/285). For preoperative planning, participants stated low confidence (subjective assessment) regarding predictors of difficult airway management in particular (69.1-79.1%). Test scores (objective assessment) were lowest for obstructive sleep apnoea as a predictor of difficult airway management (28.8% correct), with participants being incorrect and unaware in 33.5% of the answers. For optimisation of basic techniques, the lowest confidence ratings related to patient positioning and prediction of difficulties (57.4-83.2%), which agreed with the lowest test scores. Concerning advanced techniques, videolaryngoscopy prompted the lowest confidence (72.4-85.9%), while emergency cricothyrotomy resulted in the lowest test scores (47.4-67.8%). Subjective and objective assessments correlated and lower confidence was associated with lower test scores: preoperative planning [r = -0.58, P < 0.001], optimisation of basic techniques [r = -0.58, P = 0.002], and advanced techniques [r = -0.71, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION: We identified knowledge gaps in important areas of adult airway management with differing findings from the subjective and objective assessments. This underlines the importance of objective assessment to guide continuing education.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind65
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)58-67
Antal sider10
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2021

ID: 60798747