Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in 1,136 singleton pregnancies conceived after programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with natural cycle FET

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Association between women's age and stage, morphology, and implantation of the competent blastocyst: a multicenter cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Serum ferritin level is inversely related to number of previous pregnancy losses in women with recurrent pregnancy loss

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue works, but challenges remain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies differ after different frozen embryo transfer (FET) protocols.

DESIGN: Register-based cohort study.

SETTING: Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): All singleton deliveries after assisted reproductive technology in Denmark from 2006 to 2014. Data consisted of 1,136 deliveries after frozen in vitro fertilization. Frozen embryo transfer cycles were grouped by type of FET protocol: programmed FET (n = 357); modified natural cycle FET (n = 611); and true natural cycle FET (n = 168).

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Obstetric outcomes (hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, placenta previa, placental abruption, induction of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section) and perinatal outcomes (post-term birth, preterm birth, birth weight, small for gestational age, large for gestational age).

RESULT(S): The risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section was significantly higher after programmed FET compared with natural cycle FET (modified natural cycle FET and true natural cycle FET). A higher risk of birth weight > 4,500 g was observed in the programmed FET group compared with natural cycle FET.

CONCLUSION(S): This study shows that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are adversely affected in programmed FET cycles. Hence, when possible, an endometrial preparation with the creation of a corpus luteum should be considered. Properly sized randomized controlled trials of FET in programmed cycle versus natural cycle including perinatal outcomes are warranted in the future.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11780826.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFertility and Sterility
Vol/bind115
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)947-956
Antal sider10
ISSN0015-0282
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 61819385