Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Adherence to guidelines on red blood cell transfusions in women having post-partum haemorrhage

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{999ccf82b97f4cfca9efd3b183f33924,
title = "Adherence to guidelines on red blood cell transfusions in women having post-partum haemorrhage",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Transfusion of blood products occurs frequently as part of the treatment of post-partum haemorrhage, but since it is both expensive and has potentially severe complications, prescription of blood products should be restricted. The aim of this study was to examine if restrictive red blood cell transfusion (RBC-T) practice for obstetric patients was in line with national Danish guidelines.METHODS: A retrospective quality assurance study was conducted at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study counted the participation of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgery, the Juliane Marie Centre, the Danish Blood Bank and the Department of Obstetrics. Patients were identified via the patient database of the Danish Blood Bank in 2015-2017, and patient files were read.RESULTS: Out of 16,698 delivering women, 196 (1.2%) received one or more RBC-T from 2015 to 2017. A total of 133 women (67.9%) received more than one RBC-T and the median was two. The most common reason for RBC-T was a {"}low haemoglobin level (Hb) + anaemic symptoms{"} (37.0%). A total of 20.3% of all RBC-Ts were prescribed based simply on a low Hb. The most common symptom of anaemia was dizziness.CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RBC-Ts for obstetric patients were conducted in line with the guidelines. However, 6.0% of RBC-Ts were registered to be in discrepancy with the guidelines and 20.3% of RBC-Ts were prescribed on the {"}low Hb{"} criterium solely. It is possible, though, that the 20.3% is overestimated due to insufficient descriptions of indications for RBC-T in patient files.FUNDING: none.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the management at Rigshospitalet.",
author = "W{\o}hlk-Hansen, {Ida Marie} and Thomas Bergholt and Kim Ekelund",
note = "Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "A10190569",
journal = "Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)",
issn = "1603-9629",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adherence to guidelines on red blood cell transfusions in women having post-partum haemorrhage

AU - Wøhlk-Hansen, Ida Marie

AU - Bergholt, Thomas

AU - Ekelund, Kim

N1 - Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

PY - 2020/5/1

Y1 - 2020/5/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Transfusion of blood products occurs frequently as part of the treatment of post-partum haemorrhage, but since it is both expensive and has potentially severe complications, prescription of blood products should be restricted. The aim of this study was to examine if restrictive red blood cell transfusion (RBC-T) practice for obstetric patients was in line with national Danish guidelines.METHODS: A retrospective quality assurance study was conducted at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study counted the participation of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgery, the Juliane Marie Centre, the Danish Blood Bank and the Department of Obstetrics. Patients were identified via the patient database of the Danish Blood Bank in 2015-2017, and patient files were read.RESULTS: Out of 16,698 delivering women, 196 (1.2%) received one or more RBC-T from 2015 to 2017. A total of 133 women (67.9%) received more than one RBC-T and the median was two. The most common reason for RBC-T was a "low haemoglobin level (Hb) + anaemic symptoms" (37.0%). A total of 20.3% of all RBC-Ts were prescribed based simply on a low Hb. The most common symptom of anaemia was dizziness.CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RBC-Ts for obstetric patients were conducted in line with the guidelines. However, 6.0% of RBC-Ts were registered to be in discrepancy with the guidelines and 20.3% of RBC-Ts were prescribed on the "low Hb" criterium solely. It is possible, though, that the 20.3% is overestimated due to insufficient descriptions of indications for RBC-T in patient files.FUNDING: none.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the management at Rigshospitalet.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Transfusion of blood products occurs frequently as part of the treatment of post-partum haemorrhage, but since it is both expensive and has potentially severe complications, prescription of blood products should be restricted. The aim of this study was to examine if restrictive red blood cell transfusion (RBC-T) practice for obstetric patients was in line with national Danish guidelines.METHODS: A retrospective quality assurance study was conducted at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study counted the participation of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgery, the Juliane Marie Centre, the Danish Blood Bank and the Department of Obstetrics. Patients were identified via the patient database of the Danish Blood Bank in 2015-2017, and patient files were read.RESULTS: Out of 16,698 delivering women, 196 (1.2%) received one or more RBC-T from 2015 to 2017. A total of 133 women (67.9%) received more than one RBC-T and the median was two. The most common reason for RBC-T was a "low haemoglobin level (Hb) + anaemic symptoms" (37.0%). A total of 20.3% of all RBC-Ts were prescribed based simply on a low Hb. The most common symptom of anaemia was dizziness.CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RBC-Ts for obstetric patients were conducted in line with the guidelines. However, 6.0% of RBC-Ts were registered to be in discrepancy with the guidelines and 20.3% of RBC-Ts were prescribed on the "low Hb" criterium solely. It is possible, though, that the 20.3% is overestimated due to insufficient descriptions of indications for RBC-T in patient files.FUNDING: none.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the management at Rigshospitalet.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32351202

VL - 67

SP - A10190569

JO - Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)

JF - Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)

SN - 1603-9629

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 61030554