Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions: Protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Long-term IV access in paediatrics - why, what, where, who and how

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Continuous peripheral perfusion index in patients admitted to hospital wards - An observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Developing and validating COVID-19 adverse outcome risk prediction models from a bi-national European cohort of 5594 patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Characteristics, interventions and longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU patients in Denmark - a nationwide, observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Clinical validation of precision medicine protocols: the last mile is the longest

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Buffered crystalloid solutions are increasingly recommended as first-line resuscitation fluids. However, guidelines do not distinguish between different types of buffered solutions. The aim of the outlined systematic review is to summarize and assess the effects of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions on patient-important outcomes.

METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing the use of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions in hospitalized patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations set by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The risk of systematic errors (bias) and random errors will be assessed, and the overall quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION: The outlined systematic review will provide important data on how patient-important outcomes are affected by intravenous administration of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions in hospitalized patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind65
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)123-127
Antal sider5
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© 2020 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 61233433