Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Accuracy of the Danish version of the 'distress thermometer'

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction With a Free Flap-What Is Next?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Functional recovery after knee arthroplasty with regional analgesia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Objective: Short screening instruments have been suggested to improve the detection of psychological symptoms. We examined the accuracy of the Danish version of the 'Distress Thermometer'. Methods: Between October 2008 and October 2009, 426 women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who were operated at the Breast Surgery Clinic of the Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, were eligible for this study. Of these, 357 participated (84%) and 333 completed a questionnaire. The distress thermometer was evaluated against the 'hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). We also examined the women's wish for referral for psychological support. Results: A cut-off score of 6 vs 7 (low:⩽6, high:⩾7) on the distress thermometer was optimal for confirming distress, with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73%. A cut-off score of 2 vs 3 was optimal for screening, with a sensitivity of 99%, a specificity of 36%, a PPV of 47% and a NPV of 99%. Of those who were distressed using the cut-off score of 2 vs 3 on the distress thermometer, 17% (n = 41) wished to be referred for psychological support and 57% (n = 140) potentially wanted a later referral. Conclusion: The distress thermometer performed satisfactorily relative to the HADS in detecting distress in our study. A screening procedure in which application of the distress thermometer is a first step could be useful for identifying persons in need of support. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPsycho-Oncology
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)436-443
ISSN1057-9249
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012

ID: 33154369