Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A Prospective Study Comparing 99mTc-Hydroxyethylene-Diphosphonate Planar Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body SPECT/CT with 18F-Fluoride PET/CT and 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI for Diagnosing Bone Metastases

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Early Postoperative 18F-FET PET/MRI for Pediatric Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Predictive value of PET response combined with baseline metabolic tumor volume in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Reproducibility of MR-based Attenuation Maps in PET/MRI and the Impact on PET Quantification in Lung Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. PET/CT prior to salvage surgery in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Age-related renal function decline in Fabry disease patients on enzyme replacement therapy: a longitudinal cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Hybrid PET/MRI imaging in healthy unsedated newborn infants with quantitative rCBF measurements using 15O-water PET

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

We prospectively evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of 99mTc-hydroxyethylene-diphosphonate (99mTc-HDP) planar bone scintigraphy (pBS), 99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT, and 18F-NaF PET/MRI for the detection of bone metastases. Methods: One hundred seventeen patients with histologically proven malignancy referred for clinical pBS were prospectively enrolled. pBS and whole-body SPECT/CT were performed followed by 18F-NaF PET/CT within 9 d. 18F-NaF PET/MRI was also performed in 46 patients. Results: Bone metastases were confirmed in 16 patients and excluded in 101, which was lower than expected. The number of equivocal scans was significantly higher for pBS than for SPECT/CT and PET/CT (18 vs. 5 and 6, respectively; P = 0.004 and 0.01, respectively). When equivocal readings were excluded, no statistically significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or overall accuracy were found when comparing the different imaging techniques. In the per-patient analysis, equivocal scans were either assumed positive for metastases ("pessimistic analysis") or assumed negative for metastases ("optimistic analysis"). The percentages of misdiagnosed patients for the pessimistic analysis were 21%, 15%, 9%, and 7% for pBS, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI, respectively. Corresponding figures for the optimistic analysis were 9%, 12%, 5%, and 7%. In those patients identified as having bone metastases according to the reference standard, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT, and PET/MRI detected additional lesions compared with pBS in 31%, 63%, and 71%, respectively. Conclusion:18F-NaF PET/CT and whole-body SPECT/CT resulted in a significant reduction of equivocal readings compared with pBS, which implies an improved diagnostic confidence. However, the clinical benefit of using, for example, 18F-NaF PET/CT or PET/MRI as compared with SPECT/CT and pBS in this patient population with a relatively low prevalence of bone metastases (14%) is likely limited. This conclusion is influenced by the low prevalence of patients with osseous metastases. There may well be significant differences in the sensitivity of SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI compared with pBS, but a larger patient population or a patient population with a higher prevalence of bone metastases would have to be studied to demonstrate this.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Vol/bind58
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)1778-1785
Antal sider8
ISSN0161-5505
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

ID: 52601162