Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A nationwide study of the quality of surgical guidelines and written patient information

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence of sarcopenia in a Danish geriatric out-patient population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Feasibility and safety of outpatient breast cancer surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Self-evaluated competence in trauma reception

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Temporal trends in length of stay and readmissions after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) support enhanced post-operative recovery and decrease morbidity. In addition, patient information leaflets (PILs) are associated with enhanced overall outcomes and improved patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the quality of CPGs and PILs in cancer surgery departments undertaking pulmonary lobectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy, whipples, colorectal and ovarian surgery.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study within 44 surgical departments in six cancer subspecialties: lung (n = 4), kidney (n = 9), bladder (n = 5), pancreas (n = 4), colorectal (n = 18) and ovarian (n = 4). Local CPGs were assessed according to nine key elements, i.e. discharge criteria and plans for mobilisation, pain management, nutrition, fluid, nausea and vomiting, antibiotics, bowel movements and urinary drainage. The PILs were evaluated using the DISCERN tool.

RESULTS: All departments had CPGs and PILs. Overall, 43% of the departments incorporated all nine key elements in the CPGs. Yet, a third of the CPGs lacked well-defined discharge criteria, and half of the PILs were of poor/very poor quality (48%); the remainder were fair (43%) or good (10%).

CONCLUSIONS: CPGs and PILs are highly available in Danish departments that perform cancer surgery. However, this study revealed that local CPGs lacked discharge criteria, and the majority of the PILs were considered of poor quality, suggesting that post-operative management after cancer surgery is of varying quality.

FUNDING: not relevant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDanish Medical Journal
Vol/bind65
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)A5491
ISSN2245-1919
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2018

ID: 54683564