Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Hvidovre Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

What Counts as Aesthetics in Science? A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of the Scientific Literature From 1970 to 2018

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Evaluative judgment across domains: Liking balance, contour, symmetry and complexity in melodies and visual designs

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The nature of beauty: behavior, cognition, and neurobiology

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  3. Visualizing Aesthetics Across Two Centuries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. There are no aesthetic emotions: Comment on Menninghaus et al. (2019)

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  5. A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Many scientific disciplines give rise to research published under the moniker of aesthetics. For instance, both psychology and neuroscience have highly active subfields focused on aesthetics research, known as empirical aesthetics and neuroaesthetics. However, it remains unclear what aesthetics is about, and, consequently, if aesthetics research pursued by different scientific disciplines addresses common problems. It is, therefore, difficult to assess how well aesthetics is doing as a scientific enterprise, identify and compare its main subfields, and quantify its productivity. To give an unbiased account of what counts as aesthetics across scientific disciplines, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of every publication found in Web of Science tagged as aesthetics. Spanning, 1970 to 2018, the retrieved literature comprised a total of 27,159 papers, 45,832 authors, and 123 countries. Visualization and bibliometric techniques were used to investigate the main research trends and subfields, growth of publications, citation analysis, and country productivity and collaborations. From 1970 to 2018, there was a clear increase in aesthetics research over time, with a stronger growth in recent years. The retrieved documents received a total of 217,931 citations, with a mean of 8.02 citations per document (SD = 25.7). Both a cluster analysis of the data, and a comparative analysis a posteriori, revealed that the aesthetics literature clusters into distinct research areas that differ significantly in their object of interest, research productivity and impact. This finding suggests that aesthetics is better thought of as a confederate of research traditions than a whole unified by common problems and research strategies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
ISSN1931-3896
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Research areas

  • Aesthetics, Bibliometrics, Neuroscience, Psychology, Web of Science

ID: 61916640