Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Hvidovre Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

A Delphi survey and international e-survey evaluating the Doha agreement meeting classification system in groin pain: Where are we 5 years later?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Anatomical retraction of the semitendinosus muscle following harvest of the distal semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Past-season, pre-season and in-season risk assessment of groin problems in male football players: a prospective full-season study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Acute Achilles' Tendon Rupture - Surgery or No Surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  • Willem M P Heijboer
  • Adam Weir
  • Eamonn Delahunt
  • Per Hölmich
  • Anthony G Schache
  • Johannes L Tol
  • Robert-Jan de Vos
  • Zarko Vuckovic
  • Andreas Serner
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the adoption of and opinions on the Doha agreement meeting classification in groin pain in athletes.

DESIGN: Delphi survey and e-survey.

METHODS: A 2-round Delphi survey among the Doha agreement meeting expert group, and a separate international e-survey among clinicians who regularly assess athletes with groin pain. Clinical cases were presented, and participants provided their preferred terms for the diagnoses. All participants reported if they had adopted the Doha agreement meeting classification system in their practice. The Doha agreement meeting experts also shared opinions on amendments to the classification system, and reported their level of agreement with suggested statements.

RESULTS: In the Delphi survey, the Doha agreement meeting experts (n = 21) reported 8-11 different terms for their primary diagnosis of each presented case. The Doha agreement meeting terminology was used by 50-67% of these experts. In the international e-survey (n = 51), 12-15 different diagnostic terms were reported in each clinical case, and 43-55% of clinicians used the Doha agreement meeting terminology. Adoption of the Doha agreement classification system in practice was reported by 73-82% of the Doha agreement meeting experts and 57-69% of the clinicians in the international e-survey. The experts suggested 49 statements regarding amendments to the classification system. Seven of these reached >75% agreement or disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS: Five years after publication, the majority of the Doha agreement expert group and independent international clinicians report adopting the Doha agreement meeting classification system. There is still considerable heterogeneity in diagnostic terminology when clinical cases are presented, and disagreement on statements related to amendments of the current classification system.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume25
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
ISSN1440-2440
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • Classification, Consensus, Diagnosis, Groin, Physical examination, Soft tissue injuries

ID: 68179779