Why published research is untrustworthy

Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov

doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

Why published research is untrustworthy

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

6 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	International Urogynecology Journal
Volume	28
Issue number	9
Pages (from-to)	1271-1274
Number of pages	4
ISSN	0937-3462
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1
Publication status	Published - Sept 2017

Keywords

Editorial

Access to Document

10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

Cite this

@article{da8dca6c249248ecb9c7493434e24de8,

title = "Why published research is untrustworthy",

keywords = "Editorial",

author = "Gunnar Lose and Niels Klarskov",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "1271--1274",

journal = "International Urogynecology Journal",

issn = "0937-3462",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why published research is untrustworthy

AU - Lose, Gunnar

AU - Klarskov, Niels

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

KW - Editorial

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85023749761

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

DO - 10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28707207

SN - 0937-3462

VL - 28

SP - 1271

EP - 1274

JO - International Urogynecology Journal

JF - International Urogynecology Journal

IS - 9

ER -

Why published research is untrustworthy

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this