Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing

Helene Speyer*, Ju Zhang, John Lysaker, David Roe

*Corresponding author for this work
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Many individuals diagnosed with psychosis make multiple attempts to discontinue antipsychotic medications. In this clinical challenge, we examine three snapshots in which shared decision-making (SDM) breaks down due to ongoing disagreement between the service user and the health care provider. We offer three perspectives on how to think about such disagreement: philosophical, psychological, and psychiatric perspectives. Finally, we propose shared deliberation as a potential model for when SDM fails, emphasizing an iterative process of mutual value sharing that avoids binary yes/no responses.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHarvard Review of Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
ISSN1067-3229
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2025

Keywords

  • Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Decision Making, Shared
  • Deprescriptions
  • Ethical Dilemmas
  • Humans
  • Morals
  • Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Shared Decision-Making Breaks Down: Solving Moral Dilemmas in Antipsychotic Deprescribing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this