Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An acetabular labral tear is a diagnostic challenge. Various clinical tests have been described, but little is known about their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the diagnostic validity of clinical tests and ultrasound as compared with MR arthrography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 18 patients (18 hips, 2 men, median age 43 (32-56) years) with impingement test, FABER test, resisted straight leg raise test, ultrasound, and MR arthrography. They had had previous periacetabular osteotomies due to symptomatic, acetabular dysplasia. All hips showed no or only slight signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0-1). RESULTS: MR arthrography identified labral tears in 17 of the 18 hips. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 94%, and was false negative in only 1 case compared to MR arthrography. The impingement test had the best diagnostic ability of the clinical tests, with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% while the negative predictive value was 13%. INTERPRETATION: The impingement test is helpful in identifying acetabular labral tears. If this test is negative and if a labral tear is still suspected, ultrasound can reliably diagnose most tears of the acetabular labrum. MR arthrography is indicated in cases where ultrasound is negative, but the patient suffers continued, specific symptoms.
Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume80
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)314-8
Number of pages4
ISSN1745-3674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Research areas

  • Acetabulum, Adult, Female, Hip Dislocation, Hip Joint, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity

ID: 32526556