Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and sciatic nerve block duration:a randomised, blinded trial inhealthy volunteers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Impact of Physician-staffed Helicopters on Pre-hospital Patient Outcomes: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Hypothermic to ischemic ratio and mortality in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  1. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of selective axillary nerve block after arthroscopic subacromial decompression

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. A difficulty with the DIFFMASK score is the difficult statistics - a reply

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Sciatic nerve blocks are used for many orthopaedic procedures on the knee, lower leg, foot and ankle.However, as nerve block durations vary considerably, timing of supplemental analgesia is challenging. Therefore, knowledge on the effect of local anaesthetic (LA) dose on block duration is important to outweigh the benefits of increasing LA dose against the risk of LA systemic toxicity. In this randomised, double-blind trial, we aimed to explore the relationship between the volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and sciatic nerve block duration. We hypothesised that increasing LA volume would prolong block duration.

METHODS: We randomised 60 healthy volunteers to receive one of fivevolumes of ropivacaine 0.2%: 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 ml. We used an ultrasound-guided, catheter-based technique targeting the sciatic nerve in the infragluteal region.Primary outcome was sensory block duration defined as time of insensitivity to a cold stimulus. Intergroup differences were tested using one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS: Mean (SD) sensory block durations for the tibial nerve(TN)with increasing volume were: 9.3 h (1.7), 10.4 h (1.6), 9.7 h (2.9), 10.7 h (2.8), 9.9 h (2.6). Mean (SD) sensory block durations for the common peroneal nerve(CPN) were: 10.6 h (2.7), 11.9 h (1.5), 11.0 h (3.3), 13.2 h (3.7), 13.5 h (6.1). There were no intergroupdifferences (P =0.67 (TN); P = 0.25 (CPN)).

CONCLUSION: Wefound no effect of increasing the volume of ropivacaine 0.2% from 5 ml to 30 ml on sensory sciaticnerve block duration.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume64
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)238-244
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

ID: 59135322