Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Visit-to-visit variability of clinical risk markers in relation to long-term complications in type 1 diabetes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Biochemical profiling, pharmacological management and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes in Danish primary care from 2001 to 2015

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Blood Pressure and Cardiorenal Outcomes With Finerenone in Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the electrocardiogram in stable outpatients with type 2 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Clinical characteristics such as HbA 1c , systolic blood pressure (SBP), albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are important when treating type 1 diabetes. We investigated the variability in these measures as risk markers for micro- and macrovascular complications.

METHODS: This prospective study included 1062 individuals with type 1 diabetes. Visit-to-visit variability of HbA 1c , SBP, albuminuria and eGFR was calculated as the SD of the residuals in individual linear regression models using all available measures in a specified period of 3 years (VV). Endpoints included were as follows: cardiovascular events (CVE) defined as myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or coronary or peripheral arterial intervention; end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) defined as eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation; eGFR decline ≥30%; and mortality. Adjustment included age, sex, cholesterol, HbA 1c , SBP, body mass index, smoking, albuminuria, eGFR, and mean, intercept, slope of respective exposure variables and regression models.

RESULTS: SBP VV was significantly associated with CVE (adjusted hazard ratio per 50% increase, (CI 95%); p: 1.21 [1.05-1.39]; p = 0.008), ESKD (1.51 [1.16-1.96]; p = 0.002) and mortality (1.25 [1.09-1.44]; p = 0.002). HbA 1c VV was significantly associated with mortality (1.51 [1.30-1.75]; p < 0.001); albuminuria VV with eGFR decline (1.14 [1.08-1.20]; p = 0.024) and ESKD (1.14 [1.02-1.27]; p < 0.001), but neither CVE nor mortality. Adjusted eGFR VV was not associated with endpoints.

CONCLUSION: In type 1 diabetes, higher variability of basic clinical risk markers adds important risk stratification information for the development of micro- and macrovascular complications.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14459
JournalDiabetic Medicine Online
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)e14459
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Diabetes UK

Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

ID: 61249654