Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Vena saphena magna in situ-bypass til ankel og fod: En prospektiv opgørelse af resultaterne af 101 procedurer hos 94 amputationstruede patienter

Translated title of the contribution: [Vena saphena magna in situ bypass to the ankel and foot. A prospective assessment of results of 101 procedures in 94 patients with threatening amputation]
  • Ole Christian Røder
  • , L P Jensen
  • , T V Schroeder
  • , J E Lorentzen
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The results of 101 in situ by-pass operations to the ankle and foot are given. Seventy-five percent of the patients had other arteriosclerotic manifestations and 55% were diabetics. Ninety-nine percent of the operations were limb salvage surgery. The accumulative secondary patency rate was 87% after one month and 65% after three years. The results did not differ from by-pass surgery to the crural arteries. The wound complication rate was 16% with an infection rate of 7% and the major amputation rate was 8% after one month and 10% after three years. The survival of this selected group of patients was lower than a group of sex- and age-matched controls. The long term results of this type of advanced by-pass surgery in limb threatening ischaemia are very satisfactory and should be a must in every vascular surgeon's armamentarium.
Translated title of the contribution[Vena saphena magna in situ bypass to the ankel and foot. A prospective assessment of results of 101 procedures in 94 patients with threatening amputation]
Original languageDanish
JournalUgeskrift for Laeger
Volume159
Issue number32
Pages (from-to)4846-9
Number of pages4
ISSN0041-5782
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Vena saphena magna in situ bypass to the ankel and foot. A prospective assessment of results of 101 procedures in 94 patients with threatening amputation]: En prospektiv opgørelse af resultaterne af 101 procedurer hos 94 amputationstruede patienter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this