Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Vector velocity volume flow estimation: Sources of error and corrections applied for arteriovenous fistulas

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Validation of an assessment tool for estimation of abdominal aortic aneurysm compression in diagnostic ultrasound

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. First report on intraoperative vector flow imaging of the heart among patients with healthy and diseased aortic valves

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Internal strain estimation for quantification of human heel pad elastic modulus: A phantom study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. In-vivo validation of fast spectral velocity estimation techniques

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Pressure Difference Estimation in Non-stenotic Carotid Bifurcation Phantoms Using Vector Flow Imaging

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Evaluation of 2D super-resolution ultrasound imaging of the rat renal vasculature using ex vivo micro-computed tomography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Highlights of the development in ultrasound during the last 70 years: A historical review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

A method for vector velocity volume flow estimation is presented, along with an investigation of its sources of error and correction of actual volume flow measurements. Volume flow errors are quantified theoretically by numerical modeling, through flow phantom measurements, and studied in vivo. This paper investigates errors from estimating volumetric flow using a commercial ultrasound scanner and the common assumptions made in the literature. The theoretical model shows, e.g. that volume flow is underestimated by 15%, when the scan plane is off-axis with the vessel center by 28% of the vessel radius. The error sources were also studied in vivo under realistic clinical conditions, and the theoretical results were applied for correcting the volume flow errors. Twenty dialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas were scanned to obtain vector flow maps of fistulas. When fitting an ellipsis to cross-sectional scans of the fistulas, the major axis was on average 10.2mm, which is 8.6% larger than the minor axis. The ultrasound beam was on average 1.5mm from the vessel center, corresponding to 28% of the semi-major axis in an average fistula. Estimating volume flow with an elliptical, rather than circular, vessel area and correcting the ultrasound beam for being off-axis, gave a significant (p=0.008) reduction in error from 31.2% to 24.3%. The error is relative to the Ultrasound Dilution Technique, which is considered the gold standard for volume flow estimation for dialysis patients. The study shows the importance of correcting for volume flow errors, which are often made in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalUltrasonics
Volume70
Pages (from-to)136-46
Number of pages11
ISSN0041-624X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 49612466