Vastagságértékek összehasonlítása kilenc macularis mezőben time-domain és spectral-domain optikai koherencia tomográfiával

Miklós Schneider; Orsolya Szekeres; Huba Kiss; Mária Kis; András Papp; János Németh

doi:10.1556/OH.2013.29785

Vastagságértékek összehasonlítása kilenc macularis mezőben time-domain és spectral-domain optikai koherencia tomográfiával

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of thickness values in nine macular subfields using time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Miklós Schneider, Orsolya Szekeres, Huba Kiss, Mária Kis, András Papp, János Németh

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: To compare macular thickness measurements with spectral-domain (Cirrus HD-OCT) and time-domain (StratusOCT) optical coherence tomography.

METHOD: Macular thickness was measured in nine ETDRS subfields in the same eye of 20 healthy subjects using both instruments. Using Cirrus HD-OCT both the Macular Cube 512×128 and Macular Cube 200×200 protocol, using StratusOCT the Fast Macular Thickness Map protocol was performed. Reproducibility of all three measurement series was assessed and the average of the measurement series was compared on each field.

RESULTS: Measurement values obtained by StratusOCT were significantly lower than those obtained by Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.001) in all subfields. Correlation coefficient between the results obtained by the two protocols of Cirrus HD-OCT was 0.977.

CONCLUSIONS: By using Cirrus HD-OCT we could observe better repeatability than with StratusOCT. Using Cirrus HD-OCT significantly higher measurement values could be obtained in all subfields than those measured with Stratus. Using different OCT instruments we get significantly different values, therefore care needs to be taken when comparing data.

Translated title of the contribution	Comparison of thickness values in nine macular subfields using time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Original language	Hungarian
Journal	Orvosi hetilap
Volume	154
Issue number	52
Pages (from-to)	2059-64
Number of pages	6
ISSN	0030-6002
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1556/OH.2013.29785
Publication status	Published - 29 Dec 2013
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1556/OH.2013.29785

Cite this

@article{864938da8c9e409b805451783bdb672e,

title = "Vastags{\'a}g{\'e}rt{\'e}kek {\"o}sszehasonl{\'i}t{\'a}sa kilenc macularis mez{\H o}ben time-domain {\'e}s spectral-domain optikai koherencia tomogr{\'a}fi{\'a}val",

abstract = "AIM: To compare macular thickness measurements with spectral-domain (Cirrus HD-OCT) and time-domain (StratusOCT) optical coherence tomography.METHOD: Macular thickness was measured in nine ETDRS subfields in the same eye of 20 healthy subjects using both instruments. Using Cirrus HD-OCT both the Macular Cube 512×128 and Macular Cube 200×200 protocol, using StratusOCT the Fast Macular Thickness Map protocol was performed. Reproducibility of all three measurement series was assessed and the average of the measurement series was compared on each field.RESULTS: Measurement values obtained by StratusOCT were significantly lower than those obtained by Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.001) in all subfields. Correlation coefficient between the results obtained by the two protocols of Cirrus HD-OCT was 0.977.CONCLUSIONS: By using Cirrus HD-OCT we could observe better repeatability than with StratusOCT. Using Cirrus HD-OCT significantly higher measurement values could be obtained in all subfields than those measured with Stratus. Using different OCT instruments we get significantly different values, therefore care needs to be taken when comparing data.",

keywords = "Adult, Female, Humans, Macula Lutea/anatomy \& histology, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods",

author = "Mikl{\'o}s Schneider and Orsolya Szekeres and Huba Kiss and M{\'a}ria Kis and Andr{\'a}s Papp and J{\'a}nos N{\'e}meth",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1556/OH.2013.29785",

language = "Ungarnsk",

volume = "154",

pages = "2059--64",

journal = "Orvosi hetilap",

issn = "0030-6002",

publisher = "Akademiai Kiado ZRt.",

number = "52",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vastagságértékek összehasonlítása kilenc macularis mezőben time-domain és spectral-domain optikai koherencia tomográfiával

AU - Schneider, Miklós

AU - Szekeres, Orsolya

AU - Kiss, Huba

AU - Kis, Mária

AU - Papp, András

AU - Németh, János

PY - 2013/12/29

Y1 - 2013/12/29

N2 - AIM: To compare macular thickness measurements with spectral-domain (Cirrus HD-OCT) and time-domain (StratusOCT) optical coherence tomography.METHOD: Macular thickness was measured in nine ETDRS subfields in the same eye of 20 healthy subjects using both instruments. Using Cirrus HD-OCT both the Macular Cube 512×128 and Macular Cube 200×200 protocol, using StratusOCT the Fast Macular Thickness Map protocol was performed. Reproducibility of all three measurement series was assessed and the average of the measurement series was compared on each field.RESULTS: Measurement values obtained by StratusOCT were significantly lower than those obtained by Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.001) in all subfields. Correlation coefficient between the results obtained by the two protocols of Cirrus HD-OCT was 0.977.CONCLUSIONS: By using Cirrus HD-OCT we could observe better repeatability than with StratusOCT. Using Cirrus HD-OCT significantly higher measurement values could be obtained in all subfields than those measured with Stratus. Using different OCT instruments we get significantly different values, therefore care needs to be taken when comparing data.

AB - AIM: To compare macular thickness measurements with spectral-domain (Cirrus HD-OCT) and time-domain (StratusOCT) optical coherence tomography.METHOD: Macular thickness was measured in nine ETDRS subfields in the same eye of 20 healthy subjects using both instruments. Using Cirrus HD-OCT both the Macular Cube 512×128 and Macular Cube 200×200 protocol, using StratusOCT the Fast Macular Thickness Map protocol was performed. Reproducibility of all three measurement series was assessed and the average of the measurement series was compared on each field.RESULTS: Measurement values obtained by StratusOCT were significantly lower than those obtained by Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.001) in all subfields. Correlation coefficient between the results obtained by the two protocols of Cirrus HD-OCT was 0.977.CONCLUSIONS: By using Cirrus HD-OCT we could observe better repeatability than with StratusOCT. Using Cirrus HD-OCT significantly higher measurement values could be obtained in all subfields than those measured with Stratus. Using different OCT instruments we get significantly different values, therefore care needs to be taken when comparing data.

KW - Adult

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Macula Lutea/anatomy & histology

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Reference Values

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84891550613

U2 - 10.1556/OH.2013.29785

DO - 10.1556/OH.2013.29785

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

C2 - 24374581

SN - 0030-6002

VL - 154

SP - 2059

EP - 2064

JO - Orvosi hetilap

JF - Orvosi hetilap

IS - 52

ER -

Vastagságértékek összehasonlítása kilenc macularis mezőben time-domain és spectral-domain optikai koherencia tomográfiával

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this