Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validering af det patientadministrerede Danske Prostate Symptom Scoringsskema

Translated title of the contribution: Validation of the patient-administered Danish Prostate Symptom Score Schedule
  • B J Hansen
  • , H L Flyger
  • , K Brasso
  • , J Schou
  • , J Nordling
  • , J T Andersen
  • , S O Mortensen
  • , H H Meyhoff
  • , S Walter
  • , T Hald
4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The DAN-PSS-1 system, a self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire comprising 12 questions related to voiding problems and the perceived bother of each individual symptom, was compared to other extensively used score systems and furthermore included in different clinical situations so as to validate the system. The system was internally consistent (alpha cr = 0.73), the median test-retest reliability of answers to each question was 83.5% (range 0-99.7%). A high degree of construct validity demonstrated in the correlation with the Madsen-Iversen score system (rs = 0.51) and with the patients' answers to questions about how bothersome their symptoms were (rs = 0.71). The discriminant validity of the DAN-PSS-1 was excellent with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94. Finally, the DAN-PSS-1 was sensitive to changes following intervention, with scores decreasing 100% after transurethral prostatectomy and 65% after four months of treatment with an alpha-blocker. The DAN-PSS-1 is reliable, valid and responsive, and therefore can be recommended for assessing the severity of symptoms among patients presenting with lower urinary tract complaints suggestive of BPH and during follow-up.
Translated title of the contributionValidation of the patient-administered Danish Prostate Symptom Score Schedule
Original languageDanish
JournalUgeskrift for Laeger
Volume159
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)591-7
Number of pages7
ISSN0041-5782
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the patient-administered Danish Prostate Symptom Score Schedule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this