Validation of suPAR turbidimetric assay on Cobas® (c502 and c702) and comparison to suPAR ELISA

Thor A Skovsted, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Maj-Britt Fruekilde, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Tomasz Pielak, Jesper Eugen-Olsen

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

suPAR is a plasma marker of chronic inflammation, and an elevated suPAR is consistently associated with worse outcome in a variety of clinical conditions. Quantification of suPAR is useful for determining patient risk in triage, but there is no fast automatized method for quick determination of suPAR. We developed and validated a rapid latex particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of plasma suPAR on the c502 and the c702 Roche Cobas® 8000 measurment systems. The turbidimetric assay was validated against the suPARnostic® ELISA (ViroGates, Denmark). This validation demonstrates suPAR can be analysed by turbidimetry giving very similar results (<15% difference) compared to the ELISA method and the observed correlations (n = 103) were strong, r > 0.95. Roche Cobas® 8000 instruments demonstrated repeatability and repoducibility, CV % at 3.4-4.1 and 5.7-11.4, respectively. The estimated limit of detection was 1.30 µg/L and 1.31 µg/L for the Cobas® c502 and c702, respectively. Dilution tests showed linearity of suPAR from 1.8 to 26.5 μg/L. The acceptable concentrations of Bilirubin, Intralipid and Hemoglobin, were 350 µmol/L, 3.3 g/L and 1.4 g/L, respectively. suPAR can be quantified reproducibly within 10 min using a turbidimetry assay. This assay is faster than ELISA with similar results, making it suitable for clinical routine analysis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Volume80
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
ISSN0036-5513
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Keywords

  • biomarker
  • ELISA
  • immunoturbidimetry assay
  • Receptors
  • soluble urokinase plasminogen activator
  • validation studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of suPAR turbidimetric assay on Cobas® (c502 and c702) and comparison to suPAR ELISA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this