Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017

Kamille Herskind, Peter Bjødstrup Jensen, Christina Anne Vinter, Lone Krebs, Lene Friis Eskildsen, Anne Broe, Anton Pottegård, Mette Bliddal

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables.

RESULTS: The PPV was ≥0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38-0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV's ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00.

CONCLUSION: Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume16
Pages (from-to)121-130
Number of pages10
ISSN1179-1349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this