Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Validation of a novel simulation-based test in robot-assisted radical prosta-tectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Carcinoma with Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. The learning curve of robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery - A randomized trial in a simulated setting

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Defining the surgical footprint in cataract surgery: patient-related outcomes dependent on the experience of the surgeon

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method. Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p  < 0.001. Test-retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p  = 0.002, p  < 0.001, and p  = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r  = 0.74, p  < 0.001. Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Endourology Case Reports
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1265-1272
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

    Research areas

  • urology, prostatectomy, robotic surgical procedures, virtual reality, medical education, Clinical Competence, Reproducibility of Results, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Humans, Male, Robotics, Prostatectomy, Virtual Reality

ID: 62067635