Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Using machine learning to identify quality-of-care predictors for emergency caesarean sections: a retrospective cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mirtazapine exposure in pregnancy and fetal safety: A nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Standard Setting in Simulation-Based Training of Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Emergency caesarean sections (ECS) are time-sensitive procedures. Multiple factors may affect team efficiency but their relative importance remains unknown. This study aimed to identify the most important predictors contributing to quality of care during ECS in terms of the arrival-to-delivery interval.

DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. ECS were classified by urgency using emergency categories one/two and three (delivery within 30 and 60 min). In total, 92 predictor variables were included in the analysis and grouped as follows: 'Maternal objective', 'Maternal psychological', 'Fetal factors', 'ECS Indication', 'Emergency category', 'Type of anaesthesia', 'Team member qualifications and experience' and 'Procedural'. Data was analysed with a linear regression model using elastic net regularisation and jackknife technique to improve generalisability. The relative influence of the predictors, percentage significant predictor weight (PSPW) was calculated for each predictor to visualise the main determinants of arrival-to-delivery interval.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patient records for mothers undergoing ECS between 2010 and 2017, Nordsjællands Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Arrival-to-delivery interval during ECS.

RESULTS: Data was obtained from 2409 patient records for women undergoing ECS. The group of predictors representing 'Team member qualifications and experience' was the most important predictor of arrival-to-delivery interval in all ECS emergency categories (PSPW 25.9% for ECS category one/two; PSPW 35.5% for ECS category three). In ECS category one/two the 'Indication for ECS' was the second most important predictor group (PSPW 24.9%). In ECS category three, the second most important predictor group was 'Maternal objective predictors' (PSPW 24.2%).

CONCLUSION: This study provides empirical evidence for the importance of team member qualifications and experience relative to other predictors of arrival-to-delivery during ECS. Machine learning provides a promising method for expanding our current knowledge about the relative importance of different factors in predicting outcomes of complex obstetric events.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere049046
JournalBMJ Open
Volume12
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)e049046
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 75504354