Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Urokinase-catalysed cleavage of the urokinase receptor requires an intact glycolipid anchor

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Two transgenic mouse models for β-subunit components of succinate-CoA ligase yielding pleiotropic metabolic alterations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Crystal structures of the ligand binding region of uPARAP: effect of calcium ion binding

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Human insulin-like growth factor II leader 2 mediates internal initiation of translation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Tumor cell MT1-MMP is dispensable for osteosarcoma tumor growth, bone degradation and lung metastasis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The collagen receptor uPARAP/Endo180 regulates collectins through unique structural elements in its FNII domain

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Cellular uptake of collagens and implications for immune cell regulation in disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. CD8+ T cells from patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls recognize hypocretin neuron-specific antigens

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Urokinase (uPA) has the striking ability to cleave its receptor, uPAR, thereby inactivating the binding potential of this molecule. Here we demonstrate that the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor of uPAR, which is attached to the third domain, is an important determinant in governing this reaction, even though the actual cleavage occurs between the first and second domains. Purified full-length GPI-anchored uPAR (GPI-uPAR) proved much more susceptible to uPA-mediated cleavage than recombinant truncated soluble uPAR (suPAR), which lacks the glycolipid anchor. This was not a general difference in proteolytic susceptibility since GPI-uPAR and suPAR were cleaved with equal efficiency by plasmin. Since the amino acid sequences of GPI-uPAR and suPAR are identical except for the C-terminal truncation, the different cleavage patterns suggest that the two uPAR variants differ in the conformation or the flexibility of the linker region between domains 1 and 2. This was supported by the fact that an antibody to the peptide AVTYSRSRYLE, amino acids 84-94 in the linker region, recognizes GPI-uPAR but not suPAR. This difference in the linker region is thus caused by a difference in a remote hydrophobic region. In accordance with this model, when the hydrophobic lipid moiety was removed from the glycolipid anchor by phospholipase C, low concentrations of uPA could no longer cleave the modified GPI-uPAR and the reactivity to the peptide antibody was greatly decreased. Naturally occurring suPAR, purified from plasma, was found to have a similar resistance to uPA cleavage as phospholipase C-treated GPI-uPAR and recombinant suPAR.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiochemical Journal
Volume358
Issue numberPt 3
Pages (from-to)673-9
Number of pages7
ISSN0264-6021
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sep 2001

    Research areas

  • Animals, CHO Cells, Chromatography, Affinity, Cricetinae, Glycosylphosphatidylinositols, Humans, Kinetics, Receptors, Cell Surface, Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator, Recombinant Proteins, Transfection, U937 Cells, Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator

ID: 46435473