Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility

George Wells; Dorcas E Beaton; Peter Tugwell; Maarten Boers; John R Kirwan; Clifton O Bingham; Annelies Boonen; Peter Brooks; Philip G Conaghan; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Maxime Dougados; Daniel E Furst; Laure Gossec; Francis Guillemin; Philip Helliwell; Sarah Hewlett; Tore K Kvien; Robert B Landewé; Lyn March; Philip J Mease; Mikkel Østergaard; Lee Simon; Jasvinder A Singh; Vibeke Strand; Désirée M van der Heijde

doi:10.3899/jrheum.131311

Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility

George Wells, Dorcas E Beaton, Peter Tugwell, Maarten Boers, John R Kirwan, Clifton O Bingham, Annelies Boonen, Peter Brooks, Philip G Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Maxime Dougados, Daniel E Furst, Laure Gossec, Francis Guillemin, Philip Helliwell, Sarah Hewlett, Tore K Kvien, Robert B Landewé, Lyn March, Philip J MeaseMikkel Østergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A Singh, Vibeke Strand, Désirée M van der Heijde

Department for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Rheumatology
Volume	41
Issue number	5
Pages (from-to)	1005-10
Number of pages	6
ISSN	0315-162X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311
Publication status	Published - May 2014

Access to Document

10.3899/jrheum.131311

Cite this

Wells, G., Beaton, D. E., Tugwell, P., Boers, M., Kirwan, J. R., Bingham, C. O., Boonen, A., Brooks, P., Conaghan, P. G., D'Agostino, M.-A., Dougados, M., Furst, D. E., Gossec, L., Guillemin, F., Helliwell, P., Hewlett, S., Kvien, T. K., Landewé, R. B., March, L., ... van der Heijde, D. M. (2014). Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility. Journal of Rheumatology, 41(5), 1005-10. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311

Wells, G, Beaton, DE, Tugwell, P, Boers, M, Kirwan, JR, Bingham, CO, Boonen, A, Brooks, P, Conaghan, PG, D'Agostino, M-A, Dougados, M, Furst, DE, Gossec, L, Guillemin, F, Helliwell, P, Hewlett, S, Kvien, TK, Landewé, RB, March, L, Mease, PJ, Østergaard, M, Simon, L, Singh, JA, Strand, V & van der Heijde, DM 2014, 'Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1005-10. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311

@article{52b7b73b644b4bd79d31b9b9870a441b,

title = "Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility",

abstract = "The {"}Discrimination{"} part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. {"}Feasibility{"} in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.",

author = "George Wells and Beaton, \{Dorcas E\} and Peter Tugwell and Maarten Boers and Kirwan, \{John R\} and Bingham, \{Clifton O\} and Annelies Boonen and Peter Brooks and Conaghan, \{Philip G\} and Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino and Maxime Dougados and Furst, \{Daniel E\} and Laure Gossec and Francis Guillemin and Philip Helliwell and Sarah Hewlett and Kvien, \{Tore K\} and Landew{\'e}, \{Robert B\} and Lyn March and Mease, \{Philip J\} and Mikkel {\O}stergaard and Lee Simon and Singh, \{Jasvinder A\} and Vibeke Strand and \{van der Heijde\}, \{D{\'e}sir{\'e}e M\}",

year = "2014",

month = may,

doi = "10.3899/jrheum.131311",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "1005--10",

journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",

issn = "0315-162X",

publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Updating the OMERACT filter

T2 - discrimination and feasibility

AU - Wells, George

AU - Beaton, Dorcas E

AU - Tugwell, Peter

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - Kirwan, John R

AU - Bingham, Clifton O

AU - Boonen, Annelies

AU - Brooks, Peter

AU - Conaghan, Philip G

AU - D'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta

AU - Dougados, Maxime

AU - Furst, Daniel E

AU - Gossec, Laure

AU - Guillemin, Francis

AU - Helliwell, Philip

AU - Hewlett, Sarah

AU - Kvien, Tore K

AU - Landewé, Robert B

AU - March, Lyn

AU - Mease, Philip J

AU - Østergaard, Mikkel

AU - Simon, Lee

AU - Singh, Jasvinder A

AU - Strand, Vibeke

AU - van der Heijde, Désirée M

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

AB - The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84899757716

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.131311

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.131311

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24692522

SN - 0315-162X

VL - 41

SP - 1005

EP - 1010

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

IS - 5

ER -

Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this