Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Unsupervised progressive elastic band exercises for frail geriatric inpatients objectively monitored by new exercise-integrated technology-a feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Motives and Barriers to Exercise Training during Hospitalization in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. From Copenhagen to Nyborg 2022: Take the Tour de France Route to #WCSPT2022

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  3. Adaptations and modifications to a co-designed intervention and its clinical implementation: a qualitative study in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Frailty is a serious condition frequently present in geriatric inpatients that potentially causes serious adverse events. Strength training is acknowledged as a means of preventing or delaying frailty and loss of function in these patients. However, limited hospital resources challenge the amount of supervised training, and unsupervised training could possibly supplement supervised training thereby increasing the total exercise dose during admission. A new valid and reliable technology, the BandCizer, objectively measures the exact training dosage performed. The purpose was to investigate feasibility and acceptability of an unsupervised progressive strength training intervention monitored by BandCizer for frail geriatric inpatients.

Methods: This feasibility trial included 15 frail inpatients at a geriatric ward. At hospitalization, the patients were prescribed two elastic band exercises to be performed unsupervised once daily. A BandCizer Datalogger enabling measurement of the number of sets, repetitions, and time-under-tension was attached to the elastic band. The patients were instructed in performing strength training: 3 sets of 10 repetitions (10-12 repetition maximum (RM)) with a separation of 2-min pauses and a time-under-tension of 8 s. The feasibility criterion for the unsupervised progressive exercises was that 33% of the recommended number of sets would be performed by at least 30% of patients. In addition, patients and staff were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention.

Results: Four (27%) out of 15 patients completed 33% of the recommended number of sets. For the total sample, the average percent of performed sets was 23% and for those who actually trained (n = 12) 26%. Patients and staff expressed a general positive attitude towards the unsupervised training as an addition to the supervised training sessions. However, barriers were also described-especially constant interruptions.

Conclusions: Based on the predefined criterion for feasibility, the unsupervised training was not feasible, although the criterion was almost met. The patients and staff mainly expressed positive attitudes towards the unsupervised training. As even a small training dosage has been shown to improve the physical performance of geriatric inpatients, the proposed intervention might be relevant if the interruptions are decreased in future large-scale trials and if the adherence is increased.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02702557, February 29, 2016. Data Protection Agency: 2016-42, February 25, 2016. Ethics Committee: No registration needed, December 8, 2015 (e-mail correspondence).

Original languageEnglish
JournalPilot and Feasibility Studies
Volume3
Issue number56
ISSN2055-5784
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52048774