Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Short Communication: Opportunities and Challenges for Early Person-Centered Care for Older Patients in Emergency Settings

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Socioeconomic inequality in telephone triage on triage response, hospitalization and 30-day mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Cognitive training for prevention of cognitive impairment in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • den Ende ES van
  • B Schouten
  • MNT Kremers
  • T Cooksley
  • CP Subbe
  • I Weichert
  • Galen LS van
  • HR Haak
  • J Kellett
  • J Alsma
  • V Siegrist
  • M Holland
  • all local collaborators
  • Hejdi Gamst-Jensen (Member of study group)
  • Dorthe Gaby Bove (Member of study group)
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Truly patient-centred care needs to be aligned with what patients consider important, and is highly desirable in the first 24 h of an acute admission, as many decisions are made during this period. However, there is limited knowledge on what matters most to patients in this phase of their hospital stay. The objective of this study was to identify what mattered most to patients in acute care and to assess the patient perspective as to whether their treating doctors were aware of this.

METHODS: This was a large-scale, qualitative, flash mob study, conducted simultaneously in sixty-six hospitals in seven countries, starting November 14th 2018, ending 50 h later. One thousand eight hundred fifty adults in the first 24 h of an acute medical admission were interviewed on what mattered most to them, why this mattered and whether they felt the treating doctor was aware of this.

RESULTS: The most reported answers to "what matters most (and why)?" were 'getting better or being in good health' (why: to be with family/friends or pick-up life again), 'getting home' (why: more comfortable at home or to take care of someone) and 'having a diagnosis' (why: to feel less anxious or insecure). Of all patients, 51.9% felt the treating doctor did not know what mattered most to them.

CONCLUSIONS: The priorities for acutely admitted patients were ostensibly disease- and care-oriented and thus in line with the hospitals' own priorities. However, answers to why these were important were diverse, more personal, and often related to psychological well-being and relations. A large group of patients felt their treating doctor did not know what mattered most to them. Explicitly asking patients what is important and why, could help healthcare professionals to get to know the person behind the patient, which is essential in delivering patient-centred care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR (Netherlands Trial Register) NTR7538 .

Original languageEnglish
Article number474
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume21
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
ISSN1472-6963
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2021

    Research areas

  • Acute care, Emergency medicine, Patient-centred care, Patient-physician communication, Quality of care, Research methods, What matters most

ID: 67445147