Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Understanding the microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: insights from molecular and microscopic approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The efficacy of topical agents used in wounds for managing chronic biofilm infections: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Biofilms of Mycobacterium abscessus complex can be sensitized to antibiotics by disaggregation and oxygenation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Minimum information guideline for spectrofotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation in microplates

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Is pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation caused by a chronic infection?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • K Johani
  • B G Fritz
  • T Bjarnsholt
  • B A Lipsky
  • S O Jensen
  • M Yang
  • A Dean
  • H Hu
  • K Vickery
  • M Malone
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Rigorous visual evidence on whether or not biofilms are involved in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is lacking. We employed a suite of molecular and microscopic approaches to investigate the microbiome, and phenotypic state of microorganisms involved in DFO.

METHODS: In 20 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO, we collected intraoperative bone specimens. To explore the microbial diversity present in infected bone we performed next generation DNA sequencing. We used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) with confocal microscopy to visualize and confirm the presence of biofilms.

RESULTS: In 19 of 20 (95%) studied patients presenting with DFO, it was associated with an infected diabetic foot ulcer. By DNA sequencing of infected bone, Corynebacterium sp. was the most commonly identified microorganism, followed by Finegoldia sp., Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Porphyromonas sp., and Anaerococcus sp. Six of 20 bone samples (30%) contained only one or two pathogens, while the remaining 14 (70%) had polymicrobial communities. Using a combination of SEM and PNA-FISH, we identified microbial aggregates in biofilms in 16 (80%) bone specimens and found that they were typically coccoid or rod-shaped aggregates.

CONCLUSIONS: The presence of biofilms in DFO may explain why non-surgical treatment of DFO, relying on systemic antibiotic therapy, may not resolve some chronic infections caused by biofilm-producing strains.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)332-339
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

    Research areas

  • Bacteria/classification, Biofilms/growth & development, DNA, Bacterial/genetics, Diabetic Foot/microbiology, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microbiota, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Osteomyelitis/microbiology, Sequence Analysis, DNA

ID: 59012268