Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Unannounced vs announced in situ simulation of emergency teams: Feasibility and staff perception of stress and learning

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Long-term Survival and Cognitive Function According to Blood Pressure Management During Cardiac Surgery. A Follow-up

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Maintaining Competence in Airway Management

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Akutte alvorlige sygdomme hos gravide og fødende

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterEducationpeer-review

  2. Blødning postpartum

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterEducationpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based medical education, often used for teaching teamwork, can be conducted in different settings: off-site (simulation centers or other settings away from clinical units) or in situ (real clinical environment), where the latter can be either announced or unannounced. Simulation in general, but especially unannounced in situ simulation, has been described as stressful and stress can affect learning. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and the perception of learning and stress.

METHODS: Sixteen standardized in situ simulations were planned in an emergency department on eight predetermined dates, with one unannounced and one announced simulation per day. Authentic ad hoc teams were formed based on the on-call staff and included doctors, nurses, radiographers, biochemist, porters, and secretaries. Data were collected using questionnaires and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

RESULTS: Eleven of the 16 in situ simulations were completed. Self-perceived learning was "good" or "very good" for 27/47 (57%) participants and 33/50 (66%) in unannounced vs announced in situ simulation (P = 0.33). Two of 47 (4%) in unannounced in situ simulation "agreed or partly agreed" that in situ simulation was stressful or unpleasant vs 12/50 (24%) in announced in situ simulation (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between unannounced and announced in situ simulation among emergency department staff according to self-perceived learning and self-perceived stress. This is relevant for the future planning of simulation when considering what is to be achieved from implementing different designs for simulation-based medical education.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume63
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)684-692
Number of pages9
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

ID: 58157397