Ultrasound versus high field magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis

York Kiat Tan, Mikkel Østergaard, Paul Bird, Philip G Conaghan

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past decade there have been significant advances in the field of musculoskeletal imaging, especially in the application of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Both modalities offer significant advantages over the previous standards of clinical examination and radiography, and allow direct visualisation of both joint inflammation and structural damage. Although measuring similar pathology, each of these imaging tools has its own benefits and limitations; understanding these will help researchers and clinicians to determine the appropriate role for these tools in RA joint assessment. This review article seeks to compare the usefulness of US and MRI in RA diagnosis, prognosis and outcome assessment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Experimental Rheumatology
Volume32
Issue number1 Suppl 80
Pages (from-to)S99-105
ISSN0392-856X
Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultrasound versus high field magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this