TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasound Transducer Pressure
T2 - An Unexplored Source of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Measurement Error
AU - Ghulam, Qasam Mohammed
AU - Svendsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard
AU - Zielinski, Alexander Hakon
AU - Eiberg, Jonas Peter
N1 - Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - This study was aimed at quantifying the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) compression phenomenon and assessing the use of a new tool to estimate transducer pressure in vivo. In this cross-sectional study, 47 participants with AAA and a median anterior-to-posterior (AP) AAA diameter of 46 mm (range: 30-76 mm) were included. The majority of the patients were overweight with body mass indexes >25 (33/47, 70%). A standardized ultrasound (US)-compatible gel pad, with a pre-defined thickness (15 mm) and mass (150 g), was interposed between the US transducer and participant to estimate the applied transducer pressure. A firm transducer pressure significantly lowered the median AP diameter from 46.1 mm (range: 29.7-76.3) to 39.4 mm (range: 21.7-67.5) (p = 0.001). The mean diameter bias between light and firm transducer pressure was 6.1 mm (95% confidence interval: 4.9-7.3). The applied transducer pressure varied significantly and could be measured by translating the deformation of a low-tech gel pad interposed between the US transducer and the participant.
AB - This study was aimed at quantifying the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) compression phenomenon and assessing the use of a new tool to estimate transducer pressure in vivo. In this cross-sectional study, 47 participants with AAA and a median anterior-to-posterior (AP) AAA diameter of 46 mm (range: 30-76 mm) were included. The majority of the patients were overweight with body mass indexes >25 (33/47, 70%). A standardized ultrasound (US)-compatible gel pad, with a pre-defined thickness (15 mm) and mass (150 g), was interposed between the US transducer and participant to estimate the applied transducer pressure. A firm transducer pressure significantly lowered the median AP diameter from 46.1 mm (range: 29.7-76.3) to 39.4 mm (range: 21.7-67.5) (p = 0.001). The mean diameter bias between light and firm transducer pressure was 6.1 mm (95% confidence interval: 4.9-7.3). The applied transducer pressure varied significantly and could be measured by translating the deformation of a low-tech gel pad interposed between the US transducer and the participant.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131800460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35691732
VL - 48
SP - 1778
EP - 1784
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
SN - 0301-5629
IS - 9
ER -