Abstract
We investigated whether model systems integrating stochastic variation into criteria for marker assessment could be used for monitoring metastatic breast cancer. A total of 3989 serum samples was obtained from 204 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy and from 112 of these patients during follow-up. Each sample was analyzed for cancer antigen 15.3, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen. The efficiency for identifying progression and nonprogression was 94% during therapy and 85% during follow-up, with no false-positive marker results for progressive disease. At clinical progressive disease, the median positive lead time was 35 days during therapy and 76 days during follow-up. Tumor marker assessment may document that a therapy is effective and ought to be continued in spite of adverse toxic effects, and that a treatment is ineffective and should be stopped to prevent unnecessary toxicity. Marker information may also be useful in studies investigating whether early treatment during follow-up will alter the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Clinical Chemistry |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 564-75 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 0009-9147 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1996 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Breast Neoplasms
- Carcinoembryonic Antigen
- Disease Progression
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Mucin-1
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Peptides
- Prospective Studies
- Tissue Polypeptide Antigen
- Treatment Outcome
- Clinical Trial
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tumor markers cancer antigen 15.3, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen for monitoring metastatic breast cancer during first-line chemotherapy and follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS