Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Triage for selection to colonoscopy?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Prehabilitation in surgery - Need for new strategies?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  2. Missed opportunities and challenges for surgical breast cancer research in the era of personalized cancer treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  1. Detection and characterization of lung cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Plasma IL-8 and ICOSLG as prognostic biomarkers in glioblastoma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by direct colonoscopy or follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal blood test has challenged the overall capacity of bowel examinations. Certain countries are facing serious colonoscopy capacity constraints, which have led to waiting lists and long-time latency of follow-up examinations. Various options for improvement are considered, including increased cut-off values of the fecal blood tests. Results from major clinical studies of blood-based, cancer-associated biomarkers have led to focus, however, on a triage concept for improved selection to colonoscopy. The triage test may include subject age, concentration of hemoglobin in a feces test and a combination of certain blood-based cancer associated biomarkers. Recent results have indicated that triage may reduce the requirements for colonoscopy by around 30%. Such results may be advantageous for the capacity, the heath budgets and in particular, the subjects, who do not need an unnecessary, unpleasant and risk-associated bowel examination.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
Volume44
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1539-1541
Number of pages3
ISSN0748-7983
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

ID: 55375487