Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Treatment of difficult-to-treat depression - clinical guideline for selected interventions

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  1. GEMRIC

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterCommunication

  2. The Danish Neuropsychological Study of the Adverse Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterCommunication

  3. Association between polarity of first episode and solar insolation in bipolar I disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  4. Diabetes, sleep disorders and risk of depression - A Danish register-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Difficult-to-treat-depression (DTD) is a clinical challenge. The interventions that are well-established for DTD are not suitable or effective for all the patients. Therefore, more treatment options are highly warranted. We formulated an evidence-based guideline concerning six interventions not well-established for DTD in Denmark.

METHODS: Selected review questions were formulated according to the PICO principle with specific definitions of the patient population (P), the intervention (I), the comparison (C), and the outcomes of interest (O), and systematic literature searches were performed stepwise for each review question to identify relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Clinical recommendations were formulated based on the evidence, the risk-benefit ratio, and perceived patient preferences.

RESULTS: We found sufficient evidence for a weak recommendation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP). The use of bright light therapy in DTD was not sufficiently supported by the evidence, but should be considered as good clinical practice. The interventions should be considered in addition to ongoing antidepressant treatment. We did not find sufficient evidence to recommend intravenous ketamine/esketamine, rumination-focused psychotherapy, or cognitive remediation to patients with DTD.

CONCLUSION: The evidence supported two of the six reviewed interventions, however it was generally weak which emphasizes the need for more good quality studies. This guideline does not cover all treatment options and should be regarded as a supplement to relevant DTD-guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Volume76
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)177-188
Number of pages12
ISSN0803-9488
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • Clinical guideline, affective disorders, persistent depressive disorder, refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression

ID: 67399319