Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Transdiagnostic group CBT vs. standard group CBT for depression, social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia/panic disorder: Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Arguments for a Phenomenologically Informed Clinical Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Transdiagnostic group CBT for anxiety disorders: the unified protocol in mental health services

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Cognitive behavioural therapy for ADHD in adults: systematic review and meta-analyses

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Et læringsteoretisk perspektiv på klinisk mesterlære

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Postdischarge interventions for depression (Protocol)

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavior Therapy (TCBT) manuals delivered in individual format have been reported to be just as effective as traditional diagnosis specific CBT manuals. We have translated and modified the "The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders" (UP-CBT) for group delivery in Mental Health Service (MHS), and shown effects comparable to traditional CBT in a naturalistic study. As the use of one manual instead of several diagnosis-specific manuals could simplify logistics, reduce waiting time, and increase therapist expertise compared to diagnosis specific CBT, we aim to test the relative efficacy of group UP-CBT and diagnosis specific group CBT.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a partially blinded, pragmatic, non-inferiority, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of UP-CBT vs diagnosis specific CBT for Unipolar Depression, Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia/Panic Disorder. In total, 248 patients are recruited from three regional MHS centers across Denmark and included in two intervention arms. The primary outcome is patient-ratings of well-being (WHO Well-being Index, WHO-5), secondary outcomes include level of depressive and anxious symptoms, personality variables, emotion regulation, reflective functioning, and social adjustment. Assessments are conducted before and after therapy and at 6 months follow-up. Weekly patient-rated outcomes and group evaluations are collected for every session. Outcome assessors, blind to treatment allocation, will perform the observer-based symptom ratings, and fidelity assessors will monitor manual adherence.

DISCUSSION: The current study will be the first RCT investigating the dissemination of the UP in a MHS setting, the UP delivered in groups, and with depressive patients included. Hence the results are expected to add substantially to the evidence base for rational group psychotherapy in MHS. The planned moderator and mediator analyses could spur new hypotheses about mechanisms of change in psychotherapy and the association between patient characteristics and treatment effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02954731 . Registered 25 October 2016.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)37
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2017

    Research areas

  • Adult, Agoraphobia/therapy, Anxiety Disorders/therapy, Clinical Protocols, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods, Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Panic Disorder/therapy, Patient Compliance, Psychotherapy, Group, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

ID: 57568424